There has been a growing dominance of some main languages as a result of globalization in the past 50 years. While some people argue that the loss of some minor languages helps to facilitate our lives and the increasing integrated economy, there still remain arguments that the disappearance of language can lead to the death of some cultures and making lives far more momentous. In my personal point of view, although the integration of using one language is necessary to the prosperity of trade and commerce, it consequently harms the diversity of cultures.
First of all, it is indisputable that language is intimately bound up with culture, thus the death of language can have negative impact on the survival of culture. Some customs, traditional norms and values are transmitted from generations to generations through words of mouth. Take the case of the increasing prevalence of English as a salient example. Nowadays, many children are taught English from a very young age for the sake of better future career path and even have no idea about mother tongue. Therefore, the interaction between old generations with younger generation is limited, which results in the inhibition of passing down culture to descendants.
Further more importantly, the loss of several languages makes lives far more momentous and less colorful rather than convenient. Some people like to travel to discover and experience diverse lifestyles in the world. When the world is the similar, experience new and thrilling things seems meaningless. There may be no motivation for learning new language and for finding out about mystery of other cultures, which eventually makes lives far more boring.
All in all, despite the huge benefits that using the same languages can bring to the wealth of economy, I strongly disagree that some languages are not important and should be erased. In the future, I believe that a campaign in terms of preserving and developing languages should be adopted for the sake of maintaining variety of cultures.
Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In today’s world, there are many different nationalities who speak different languages. However, due to the globalisation of our society, many of these languages are now extinct. Some individuals commonly believe that life would be better if fewer languages were spoken. I agree that languages should be preserved for several reasons.
On the one hand, it is true that if did not exist such a variety of languages communication will be easier, as well as travelling and working in other countries. Furthermore, this idea will also aid the people who are illiterate, as they have a hard time learning different languages they will feel more integrated into society by speaking the same idiom as them.
On the other hand, I believe it is beneficial for our society if they speak different languages. It will increase their knowledge and the ability to learn new idioms. For example, the Indians have their own speech to communicate with each other, and in my opinion, this kind of language should not disappear, since it represents the culture of that people and it is the strongest heritage they possess.
To conclude, it is true that life would be easier if less different idioms were spoken. That is why the English language is worldwide spoken because it facilitates communication among distinct nationalities. Despite this huge advantage, I believe that is paramount to maintain different and old idioms since they represent their people and their culture. Therefore, if we only speak one or two languages in the entire world, it would turn out in a monotonous and tedious place to live.
Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.4 (80%) 2 votes