• Home   /  
  • Archive by category "1"

Unlock Bullet Point Assignment Of Deed

1. Jemal A, Clegg LX, Ward E, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2001, with a special feature regarding survival. Cancer. 2004;101:3–27. [PubMed]

2. Trends in Indian Health, 2000–2001 Edition. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2004.

3. Denny CH, Holtzman D, Cobb N. Surveillance for health behaviors of American Indians and Alaska Natives: findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1997–2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52(SS-7):1–13. [PubMed]

4. Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, et al., eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2001. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute; 2004.

5. Ponce NA, Babey SH, Etzioni DA, Spencer BA, Brown ER, Chawla N. Cancer Screening in California: Findings From the 2001 California Health Interview Survey. Los Angeles, Calif: Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, Los Angeles; 2003.

6. Liao Y, Tucker P, Giles WH. Health status of American Indians compared with other racial/ethnic minority populations—selected states, 2001–2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:1148–1152. [PubMed]

7. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2001.

8. California Health Interview Survey 2001 Methodology Series: Report 1—Sample Design. Los Angeles, Calif: Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, Los Angeles; 2002.

9. Swan J, Edwards BK. Cancer rates among American Indians and Alaska Natives: is there a national perspective? Cancer. 2003;98:1262–1272. [PubMed]

10. Cobb N, Paisano RE. Patterns of cancer mortality among Native Americans. Cancer. 1998;83: 2377–2383. [PubMed]

11. Counting Indians in the 2000 Census: Impact of the Multiple Race Response Option. Washington, DC: Indian and Native American Employment Coalition; 2004.

12. Friedman DJ, Cohen BB, Averbach AR, Norton JM. Race/ethnicity and OMB Directive 15: implications for state public health practice. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:1714–1719. [PMC free article][PubMed]

13. Burhansstipanov L, Satter DE. Office of Management and Budget racial categories and implications for American Indians and Alaska Natives. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:1720–1723. [PMC free article][PubMed]

14. California Health Interview Survey 2001 Methodology Series: Report 5—Weighting and Variance Estimation. Los Angeles, Calif: Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, Los Angeles; 2002.

15. Adjusting for Miscoding of Indian Race on State Death Certificates. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1996.

16. Frost F, Shy KK. Racial differences between linked birth and infant death records in Washington State. Am J Public Health. 1980;70:974–976. [PMC free article][PubMed]

17. Frost F, Taylor V, Fires E. Racial misclassification of Native Americans in a surveillance, epidemiology and end results cancer registry. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84:957–962. [PubMed]

18. Hahn RA, Truman BI, Barker ND. Identify ancestry: the reliability of ancestral identification in the United States by self, proxy, interviewers, and funeral director. Epidemiology. 1996;7:75–80. [PubMed]

19. Hahn RA, Mulinare J, Teutsch SM. Inconsistencies in coding of race and ethnicity between birth and death in US infants: a new look at infant mortality, 1983 through 1985. JAMA. 1992;267:259–263. [PubMed]

20. Hahn R. The state of federal health statistics on racial and ethnic groups. JAMA. 1992;267:268–271. [PubMed]

21. Hahn RA. Differential classification of American Indian race on birth and death certificates, US. reservation states, 1983–1985. The Provider. January 1993:10.

22. Sugarman JR, Soderberg R, Gordon JE, Rivara FP. Racial misclassification of American Indians: its effect on injury rates in Oregon, 1989 through 1990. Am J Public Health. 1993;83:681–684. [PMC free article][PubMed]

23. Sugarman JR, Hill G, Forquera R, Frost FJ. Coding of race on death certificates of patients of an urban Indian health clinic, Washington, 1973–1988. The Provider. July 1992:113–115.

24. Burhansstipanov L, Hampton JW, Wiggins C. Issues in cancer data and surveillance for American Indian and Alaska Native populations. J Registry Manage. 1999;29:153–157.

25. Burhansstipanov L. Urban Native American health issues. Cancer. 2000;88:987–993.

26. California Health Interview Survey 2001 Sample: Response Rate and Representativeness. Los Angeles, Calif: Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, Los Angeles; 2003.

27. Broken Promises: Evaluating the Native American Health Care System. Washington, DC: Office of the General Counsel, US Commission on Civil Rights; 2004.

28. On the Road to 2010: American Indian Focus Group Final Report. Denver, Colo: US Bureau of the Census; 2003.

29. Klein RJ, Schoenborn CA. Age adjustment using the 2000 projected US. population. In: Healthy People Statistical Notes. Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics; 2001. [PubMed]

1. Maxwell CJ, Kozak JF, Desjardins-Denault SD, Parboosingh J. Factors important in promoting mammography screening among Canadian women. Can J Public Health. 1997;88:346–350. [PubMed]

2. Katz SJ, Hofer TP. Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage: breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United Kingdom. JAMA. 1994;272:530–534. [PubMed]

3. Gorey KM, Holowaty EJ, Laukkanen E, Fehringer G, Richter NL. Association between socioeconomic status and cancer incidence in Toronto, Ontario: possible confounding of cancer mortality by incidence and survival. Cancer Prev Control. 1998;2:236–241. [PubMed]

4. Billings J, Zeitel L, Lukomnik J, Carey TS, Blank AE, Newman L. Datawatch: impact of socioeconomic status on hospital use in New York City. Health Aff (Millwood). 1993;12:162–173. [PubMed]

5. Lantz PM, Weigers ME, House JS. Education and income differentials in breast and cervical cancer screening: policy implications for rural women. Med Care. 1997;35:219–236. [PubMed]

6. Kenyon TA, Matuck MA, Stroh G. Persistent low immunization coverage among inner-city preschool children despite access to free vaccine. Pediatrics. 1998;101:612–616. [PubMed]

7. Snider J, Beauvais JE, Levy I, Villeneuve P, Pennock J. Trends in mammography and Pap smear utilization in Canada. Chronic Dis Can. 1996;17:108–117. [PubMed]

8. Katz SJ, Zemencuk JK, Hofer TP. Breast cancer screening in the United States and Canada, 1994: socioeconomic disparities persist. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:799–803. [PMC free article][PubMed]

9. Link BG, Northridge ME, Phelan JC, Ganz ML. Social epidemiology and the fundamental cause concept: on the structuring of effective cancer screens by socioeconomic status. Milbank Q. 1998;76:375–402. [PMC free article][PubMed]

10. Starfield B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.

11. Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S, Frankel S. How policy informs the evidence. “Evidence based” thinking can lead to debased policy making. BMJ. 2001;322:184–185. [PMC free article][PubMed]

12. Grunfeld E. Cervical cancer: screening hard-to-reach groups. Can Med Assoc J. 1997;157:543–545. [PMC free article][PubMed]

13. Paquette D, Snider J, Bouchard F, et al. Performance of screening mammography in organized programs in Canada in 1996. Can Med Assoc J. 2000;163:1133–1138. [PMC free article][PubMed]

14. Miller AB. Organized breast cancer screening programs in Canada. Can Med Assoc J. 2000;163:1150–1151. [PMC free article][PubMed]

15. Roos LL, Traverse D, Turner D, Minish E. Delivering prevention: the role of public programs in delivering care to high risk populations. Med Care. 1999;37:JS264–JS278 [PubMed]

16. Gaudette LA, Altmayer CA, Nobrega KMP, Lee J. Trends in mammography utilization, 1981 to 1994. Health Rep. 1996;8:17–27. [PubMed]

17. Decker KM, Harrison ML, Tate RB. Satisfaction of women attending the Manitoba Breast Screening Program. Prev Med. 1999;29:22–27. [PubMed]

18. Roberts JD, Poffenroth LA, Roos LL, Bebchuk JD, Carter AO. Monitoring childhood immunizations: a Canadian approach. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1666–1668. [PMC free article][PubMed]

19. Miller AB, Anderson G, Brisson J, et al. Report of a national workshop on screening for cancer of the cervix. Can Med Assoc J. 1991;145(suppl 10):1301–1325. [PMC free article][PubMed]

20. Roos LL, Nicol JP, Cageorge SM. Using administrative data for longitudinal research: comparisons with primary data collection. J Chron Dis. 1987;40:41–49. [PubMed]

21. Roos NP, Roos LL, Mossey JM, Havens B. Using administrative data to predict important health outcomes: entry to hospital, nursing home, and death. Med Care. 1988;26:221–239. [PubMed]

22. Muhajarine N, Mustard CA, Roos LL, Young TK, Gelskey DE. Comparison of survey data and physician claims data for detecting hypertension. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:711–718. [PubMed]

23. Roos LL, Nicol JP. A research registry: uses, development, and accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:39–47. [PubMed]

24. Maxwell CJ, Bancej CM, Snider J. Predictors of mammography use among Canadian women aged 50–69: findings from the 1966/97 National Population Health Survey. Can Med Assoc J. 2001;164:329–334. [PMC free article][PubMed]

25. Maxwell CJ, Bancej CM, Snider J, Vik SA. Factors important in promoting cervical cancer screening among Canadian women: findings from the 1996–97 National Population Health Survey (NPHS). Can J Public Health. 2001;92:127–133. [PubMed]

26. Lee J, Parsons GF, Gentlemen JF. Falling short of Pap test guidelines. Health Rep. 1998;10:9–19. [PubMed]

27. De Grasse CE, O’Connor AM, Boulet J, Edwards N, Bryant H, Breithaupt K. Changes in Canadian women’s mammography rates since the implementation of mass screening programs. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:927–929. [PMC free article][PubMed]

28. Roos NP, Mustard CA. Variation in health and health care use by socioeconomic status in Winnipeg, Canada: does the system work well? Yes and no. Milbank Q. 1997;75:89–111. [PMC free article][PubMed]

29. Statistics Canada. Postal Code Conversion File: Detailed User Guide. Ottawa, Ontario: Geography Division, Statistics Canada; 1988.

30. Mustard CA, Derksen S, Berthelot J-M, Wolfson W. Assessing ecologic proxies for household income: a comparison of household and neighbourhood-level income measures in the study of population health status. Health Place. 1999;5:157–171. [PubMed]

31. Cohen MM. Using administrative data for case-control studies: the case of the Papanicolaou smear. Ann Epidemiol. 1993;3:93–98. [PubMed]

32. Young TK, Kliewer E, Blanchard JF, Mayer T. Monitoring disease burden and preventive behavior with data linkage: cervical cancer among aboriginal people in Manitoba, Canada. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:1466–1468. [PMC free article][PubMed]

33. Martens P, Bond R, Jebamani L, et al. The Health and Health Care Use of registered First Nation People Living in Manitoba: A Population-Based Study. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy; April2002.

34. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1990.

35. Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 4th ed. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth Publishing Co; 1995.

36. Mason BW, Donnelly PD. Targeted mailing of information to improve uptake of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: a randomised controlled trial. Commun Dis Public Health. 2000;3:67–68. [PubMed]

37. Elliman D, Bedford H. MMR vaccine: the continuing saga. BMJ. 2001;322:183–184. [PMC free article][PubMed]

38. Jefferson T. Real or perceived adverse effects of vaccines and the media—a tale of our times. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54:402–403. [PMC free article][PubMed]

39. Brownell MD, Martens P, Kozyrskyj A, et al. Assessing the Health of Children in Manitoba: A Population-Based Study. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation; February2001:159.

40. Goel V. Factors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from the Ontario Health Survey. Can J Public Health. 1994;85:125–127. [PubMed]

41. Gyorkos TW, Tannenbaum TN, Abrahamowicz M, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of immunization delivery methods. Can J Public Health. 1994;85(1 suppl 1):S14–S30. [PubMed]

42. Pierce C, Goldstein M, Suozzi K, Gallaher M, Dietz V, Stevenson J. The impact of the standards for pediatric immunization practices on vaccination coverage levels. JAMA. 1996;276:626–630. [PubMed]

43. Shefer A, Briss P, Rodewald L, et al. Improving immunization coverage rates: an evidence-based review of the literature. Epidemiol Rev. 1999;21:96–142. [PubMed]

44. Szilagyi PG, Bordley C, Vann JC, et al. Effect of patient reminder/recall interventions on immunization rates. JAMA. 2000;284:1820–1827. [PubMed]

45. Gentleman JF, Lee J. Who doesn’t get a mammogram? Health Rep. 1997;9:19–28.

46. Colditz GA, Hoaglin DC, Berkey CS. Cancer incidence and mortality: the priority of screening frequency and population coverage. Milbank Q. 1997;75:147–173. [PMC free article][PubMed]

47. Skinner CS, Stretcher VJ, Hospers H. Physicians’ recommendations for mammography: do tailored messages make a difference? Am J Public Health. 1994;84:43–49. [PMC free article][PubMed]

48. Davis TC, Arnold C, Berke HJ, Nandy I, Jackson RH, Glass J. Knowledge and attitude on screening mammography among low-literate, low-income women. Cancer. 2001;78:1912–1920. [PubMed]

49. Hofer TP, Katz SJ. Healthy behaviors among women in the United States and Ontario: the effect on use of preventive care. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:1755–1759. [PMC free article][PubMed]

50. Bottorff JL, Johnson JL, Bhagat R, et al. Beliefs related to breast health practices: the perceptions to South Asian women living in Canada. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:2075–2085. [PubMed]

51. Mitchell SM, Shortell SM. The governance and management of effective community health partnerships: a typology for research, policy, and practice. Milbank Q. 2001;78:241–289. [PMC free article][PubMed]

52. Hislop TG, Clarke HF, Deschamps M, et al. Cervical cytology screening: how can we improve rates among First Nations women in urban British Columbia? Can Fam Physician. 1996;42:1701–1708. [PMC free article][PubMed]

One thought on “Unlock Bullet Point Assignment Of Deed

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *