1. Jemal A, Clegg LX, Ward E, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2001, with a special feature regarding survival. Cancer. 2004;101:3–27. [PubMed]
2. Trends in Indian Health, 2000–2001 Edition. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2004.
3. Denny CH, Holtzman D, Cobb N. Surveillance for health behaviors of American Indians and Alaska Natives: findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1997–2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52(SS-7):1–13. [PubMed]
4. Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, et al., eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2001. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute; 2004.
5. Ponce NA, Babey SH, Etzioni DA, Spencer BA, Brown ER, Chawla N. Cancer Screening in California: Findings From the 2001 California Health Interview Survey. Los Angeles, Calif: Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, Los Angeles; 2003.
6. Liao Y, Tucker P, Giles WH. Health status of American Indians compared with other racial/ethnic minority populations—selected states, 2001–2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:1148–1152. [PubMed]
7. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2001.
8. California Health Interview Survey 2001 Methodology Series: Report 1—Sample Design. Los Angeles, Calif: Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, Los Angeles; 2002.
9. Swan J, Edwards BK. Cancer rates among American Indians and Alaska Natives: is there a national perspective? Cancer. 2003;98:1262–1272. [PubMed]
10. Cobb N, Paisano RE. Patterns of cancer mortality among Native Americans. Cancer. 1998;83: 2377–2383. [PubMed]
11. Counting Indians in the 2000 Census: Impact of the Multiple Race Response Option. Washington, DC: Indian and Native American Employment Coalition; 2004.
12. Friedman DJ, Cohen BB, Averbach AR, Norton JM. Race/ethnicity and OMB Directive 15: implications for state public health practice. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:1714–1719. [PMC free article][PubMed]
13. Burhansstipanov L, Satter DE. Office of Management and Budget racial categories and implications for American Indians and Alaska Natives. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:1720–1723. [PMC free article][PubMed]
14. California Health Interview Survey 2001 Methodology Series: Report 5—Weighting and Variance Estimation. Los Angeles, Calif: Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, Los Angeles; 2002.
15. Adjusting for Miscoding of Indian Race on State Death Certificates. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1996.
16. Frost F, Shy KK. Racial differences between linked birth and infant death records in Washington State. Am J Public Health. 1980;70:974–976. [PMC free article][PubMed]
17. Frost F, Taylor V, Fires E. Racial misclassification of Native Americans in a surveillance, epidemiology and end results cancer registry. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84:957–962. [PubMed]
18. Hahn RA, Truman BI, Barker ND. Identify ancestry: the reliability of ancestral identification in the United States by self, proxy, interviewers, and funeral director. Epidemiology. 1996;7:75–80. [PubMed]
19. Hahn RA, Mulinare J, Teutsch SM. Inconsistencies in coding of race and ethnicity between birth and death in US infants: a new look at infant mortality, 1983 through 1985. JAMA. 1992;267:259–263. [PubMed]
20. Hahn R. The state of federal health statistics on racial and ethnic groups. JAMA. 1992;267:268–271. [PubMed]
21. Hahn RA. Differential classification of American Indian race on birth and death certificates, US. reservation states, 1983–1985. The Provider. January 1993:10.
22. Sugarman JR, Soderberg R, Gordon JE, Rivara FP. Racial misclassification of American Indians: its effect on injury rates in Oregon, 1989 through 1990. Am J Public Health. 1993;83:681–684. [PMC free article][PubMed]
23. Sugarman JR, Hill G, Forquera R, Frost FJ. Coding of race on death certificates of patients of an urban Indian health clinic, Washington, 1973–1988. The Provider. July 1992:113–115.
24. Burhansstipanov L, Hampton JW, Wiggins C. Issues in cancer data and surveillance for American Indian and Alaska Native populations. J Registry Manage. 1999;29:153–157.
25. Burhansstipanov L. Urban Native American health issues. Cancer. 2000;88:987–993.
26. California Health Interview Survey 2001 Sample: Response Rate and Representativeness. Los Angeles, Calif: Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, Los Angeles; 2003.
27. Broken Promises: Evaluating the Native American Health Care System. Washington, DC: Office of the General Counsel, US Commission on Civil Rights; 2004.
28. On the Road to 2010: American Indian Focus Group Final Report. Denver, Colo: US Bureau of the Census; 2003.
29. Klein RJ, Schoenborn CA. Age adjustment using the 2000 projected US. population. In: Healthy People Statistical Notes. Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics; 2001. [PubMed]
1. Maxwell CJ, Kozak JF, Desjardins-Denault SD, Parboosingh J. Factors important in promoting mammography screening among Canadian women. Can J Public Health. 1997;88:346–350. [PubMed]
2. Katz SJ, Hofer TP. Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage: breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United Kingdom. JAMA. 1994;272:530–534. [PubMed]
3. Gorey KM, Holowaty EJ, Laukkanen E, Fehringer G, Richter NL. Association between socioeconomic status and cancer incidence in Toronto, Ontario: possible confounding of cancer mortality by incidence and survival. Cancer Prev Control. 1998;2:236–241. [PubMed]
4. Billings J, Zeitel L, Lukomnik J, Carey TS, Blank AE, Newman L. Datawatch: impact of socioeconomic status on hospital use in New York City. Health Aff (Millwood). 1993;12:162–173. [PubMed]
5. Lantz PM, Weigers ME, House JS. Education and income differentials in breast and cervical cancer screening: policy implications for rural women. Med Care. 1997;35:219–236. [PubMed]
6. Kenyon TA, Matuck MA, Stroh G. Persistent low immunization coverage among inner-city preschool children despite access to free vaccine. Pediatrics. 1998;101:612–616. [PubMed]
7. Snider J, Beauvais JE, Levy I, Villeneuve P, Pennock J. Trends in mammography and Pap smear utilization in Canada. Chronic Dis Can. 1996;17:108–117. [PubMed]
8. Katz SJ, Zemencuk JK, Hofer TP. Breast cancer screening in the United States and Canada, 1994: socioeconomic disparities persist. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:799–803. [PMC free article][PubMed]
9. Link BG, Northridge ME, Phelan JC, Ganz ML. Social epidemiology and the fundamental cause concept: on the structuring of effective cancer screens by socioeconomic status. Milbank Q. 1998;76:375–402. [PMC free article][PubMed]
10. Starfield B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.
11. Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S, Frankel S. How policy informs the evidence. “Evidence based” thinking can lead to debased policy making. BMJ. 2001;322:184–185. [PMC free article][PubMed]
12. Grunfeld E. Cervical cancer: screening hard-to-reach groups. Can Med Assoc J. 1997;157:543–545. [PMC free article][PubMed]
13. Paquette D, Snider J, Bouchard F, et al. Performance of screening mammography in organized programs in Canada in 1996. Can Med Assoc J. 2000;163:1133–1138. [PMC free article][PubMed]
14. Miller AB. Organized breast cancer screening programs in Canada. Can Med Assoc J. 2000;163:1150–1151. [PMC free article][PubMed]
15. Roos LL, Traverse D, Turner D, Minish E. Delivering prevention: the role of public programs in delivering care to high risk populations. Med Care. 1999;37:JS264–JS278 [PubMed]
16. Gaudette LA, Altmayer CA, Nobrega KMP, Lee J. Trends in mammography utilization, 1981 to 1994. Health Rep. 1996;8:17–27. [PubMed]
17. Decker KM, Harrison ML, Tate RB. Satisfaction of women attending the Manitoba Breast Screening Program. Prev Med. 1999;29:22–27. [PubMed]
18. Roberts JD, Poffenroth LA, Roos LL, Bebchuk JD, Carter AO. Monitoring childhood immunizations: a Canadian approach. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1666–1668. [PMC free article][PubMed]
19. Miller AB, Anderson G, Brisson J, et al. Report of a national workshop on screening for cancer of the cervix. Can Med Assoc J. 1991;145(suppl 10):1301–1325. [PMC free article][PubMed]
20. Roos LL, Nicol JP, Cageorge SM. Using administrative data for longitudinal research: comparisons with primary data collection. J Chron Dis. 1987;40:41–49. [PubMed]
21. Roos NP, Roos LL, Mossey JM, Havens B. Using administrative data to predict important health outcomes: entry to hospital, nursing home, and death. Med Care. 1988;26:221–239. [PubMed]
22. Muhajarine N, Mustard CA, Roos LL, Young TK, Gelskey DE. Comparison of survey data and physician claims data for detecting hypertension. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:711–718. [PubMed]
23. Roos LL, Nicol JP. A research registry: uses, development, and accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:39–47. [PubMed]
24. Maxwell CJ, Bancej CM, Snider J. Predictors of mammography use among Canadian women aged 50–69: findings from the 1966/97 National Population Health Survey. Can Med Assoc J. 2001;164:329–334. [PMC free article][PubMed]
25. Maxwell CJ, Bancej CM, Snider J, Vik SA. Factors important in promoting cervical cancer screening among Canadian women: findings from the 1996–97 National Population Health Survey (NPHS). Can J Public Health. 2001;92:127–133. [PubMed]
26. Lee J, Parsons GF, Gentlemen JF. Falling short of Pap test guidelines. Health Rep. 1998;10:9–19. [PubMed]
27. De Grasse CE, O’Connor AM, Boulet J, Edwards N, Bryant H, Breithaupt K. Changes in Canadian women’s mammography rates since the implementation of mass screening programs. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:927–929. [PMC free article][PubMed]
28. Roos NP, Mustard CA. Variation in health and health care use by socioeconomic status in Winnipeg, Canada: does the system work well? Yes and no. Milbank Q. 1997;75:89–111. [PMC free article][PubMed]
29. Statistics Canada. Postal Code Conversion File: Detailed User Guide. Ottawa, Ontario: Geography Division, Statistics Canada; 1988.
30. Mustard CA, Derksen S, Berthelot J-M, Wolfson W. Assessing ecologic proxies for household income: a comparison of household and neighbourhood-level income measures in the study of population health status. Health Place. 1999;5:157–171. [PubMed]
31. Cohen MM. Using administrative data for case-control studies: the case of the Papanicolaou smear. Ann Epidemiol. 1993;3:93–98. [PubMed]
32. Young TK, Kliewer E, Blanchard JF, Mayer T. Monitoring disease burden and preventive behavior with data linkage: cervical cancer among aboriginal people in Manitoba, Canada. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:1466–1468. [PMC free article][PubMed]
33. Martens P, Bond R, Jebamani L, et al. The Health and Health Care Use of registered First Nation People Living in Manitoba: A Population-Based Study. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy; April2002.
34. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1990.
35. Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 4th ed. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth Publishing Co; 1995.
36. Mason BW, Donnelly PD. Targeted mailing of information to improve uptake of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: a randomised controlled trial. Commun Dis Public Health. 2000;3:67–68. [PubMed]
37. Elliman D, Bedford H. MMR vaccine: the continuing saga. BMJ. 2001;322:183–184. [PMC free article][PubMed]
38. Jefferson T. Real or perceived adverse effects of vaccines and the media—a tale of our times. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54:402–403. [PMC free article][PubMed]
39. Brownell MD, Martens P, Kozyrskyj A, et al. Assessing the Health of Children in Manitoba: A Population-Based Study. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation; February2001:159.
40. Goel V. Factors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from the Ontario Health Survey. Can J Public Health. 1994;85:125–127. [PubMed]
41. Gyorkos TW, Tannenbaum TN, Abrahamowicz M, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of immunization delivery methods. Can J Public Health. 1994;85(1 suppl 1):S14–S30. [PubMed]
42. Pierce C, Goldstein M, Suozzi K, Gallaher M, Dietz V, Stevenson J. The impact of the standards for pediatric immunization practices on vaccination coverage levels. JAMA. 1996;276:626–630. [PubMed]
43. Shefer A, Briss P, Rodewald L, et al. Improving immunization coverage rates: an evidence-based review of the literature. Epidemiol Rev. 1999;21:96–142. [PubMed]
44. Szilagyi PG, Bordley C, Vann JC, et al. Effect of patient reminder/recall interventions on immunization rates. JAMA. 2000;284:1820–1827. [PubMed]
45. Gentleman JF, Lee J. Who doesn’t get a mammogram? Health Rep. 1997;9:19–28.
46. Colditz GA, Hoaglin DC, Berkey CS. Cancer incidence and mortality: the priority of screening frequency and population coverage. Milbank Q. 1997;75:147–173. [PMC free article][PubMed]
47. Skinner CS, Stretcher VJ, Hospers H. Physicians’ recommendations for mammography: do tailored messages make a difference? Am J Public Health. 1994;84:43–49. [PMC free article][PubMed]
48. Davis TC, Arnold C, Berke HJ, Nandy I, Jackson RH, Glass J. Knowledge and attitude on screening mammography among low-literate, low-income women. Cancer. 2001;78:1912–1920. [PubMed]
49. Hofer TP, Katz SJ. Healthy behaviors among women in the United States and Ontario: the effect on use of preventive care. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:1755–1759. [PMC free article][PubMed]
50. Bottorff JL, Johnson JL, Bhagat R, et al. Beliefs related to breast health practices: the perceptions to South Asian women living in Canada. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:2075–2085. [PubMed]
51. Mitchell SM, Shortell SM. The governance and management of effective community health partnerships: a typology for research, policy, and practice. Milbank Q. 2001;78:241–289. [PMC free article][PubMed]
52. Hislop TG, Clarke HF, Deschamps M, et al. Cervical cytology screening: how can we improve rates among First Nations women in urban British Columbia? Can Fam Physician. 1996;42:1701–1708. [PMC free article][PubMed]